Clark And Menefee, Architects Essays - Menefee, Formwork, Plywood

Clark And Menefee, Architects Maggie Cookman September 27, 2000 The Reid House was designed by W.G. Clark and Charles Menefee and built in Johns Island, SC in 1986. Menefee and Clark designed primarily in the American South. Clark and Menefee are known for their tripartite vertical organization. The base level normally consists of secondary bedroom(s)/studio spaces and services. The First floor is a piano nobile of principal rooms with a double-height living space. The attic level usually consists of the master bedroom and bath. The Reid House is set up in this fashion. The house is located in a modest setting, surrounded by house trailers and cheaply built houses. The image of the house was derived from vernacular farm buildings as well as from more formal Palladian structures. One author described the setting as Johns Island, a peaceful landscape where truck farmers tend tomato fields carved out of scrub-pine and dwarf-cedar forests, and where the front yards of shacks are littered with junked cars, rusting agricultural machinery, and other dec aying impedimenta of the Industrial Revolution. The house is a three-story tower with two components. The first is a 20 ft. sq. section made of concrete block, housing the living and bedrooms, referred to as the served space(s). The second part, referred to as the serving space(s), is a wood-frame shed that holds the kitchen and the bathrooms. These two components are joined at the fireplace and chimney, around which the stair winds. The materials used for the house are inexpensive, in keeping with the surrounding structures. One section is made of concrete blocks, exposed on the inside and covered with waterproofing paint on the outside. The other part of the house is sheathed in plywood and battens and its roof is covered in asphalt shingle. The floors are painted pine, the interior partitions, painted plywood. The total cost of the house was $102,000, only $2,000 over the budget that the Reids had set. They wanted the house built because they wanted to move their two small children out of a trailer home, and they wanted to have a larger space in which they could manage their 120-acre horse farm. The total area of the house is only 1600 sq. ft. One author noted that the house [reconciles] lofty aspirations and modest means. W.G. Clark is not a native to Charleston. He worked for six years for Robert Venturi before going to work with Charles Menefee on the Middleton Inn for Charles Duell. This project was Clarks first major work, and was more in tune with the work of Peter Eisenman. Charles Duell, a Middleton descendent, dreamed up the idea of the Middleton Inn, 15 miles outside of Charleston. He envisioned a guesthouse and conference center, and planned on seasonal guests who came for flower festivals and other annual events. The Inn was remote from city tourist attractions, and Clark capitalized on this and made it a rural retreat in the woods. The Inn was filled with Charleston details, which helped to bridge the gap between the city and the rural hideaway in the woods. These details included terra-cotta chimney pots, wooden shutters, stick-style furniture, special stucco called slave coat, and Charleston Green paint, which accentuated the building in the midst of the trees and growth in the surroundi ng woods. Clark and Menefee exemplified an uncommon American virtue, restraint. Their structures had a simple and clear formal order, and were compact in plan. Their belief was that generosity was achieved in section. In describing their architecture, one critic notes that Clark and Menefees buildings distil a didactic language through which both formal meaning and construction can be revealed and understood. It was also said that their houses were idealized pavilions sitting solidly on the site in the classical manner. Their designs were small and succinct, and interior finishes were sometimes rough, but their craft was excellent. Clark and Menefee succeeded in practical designs, while economizing on budgets and space.

Compare and contrast Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman Essays

Compare and contrast Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman Essays Compare and contrast Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman Compare and contrast Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman The lyrics composed by Emily Dickinson's and Walt Whitman have various contrasts. Case in point, the Dickinson's ballads are basic and brief time Whitman's lyrics are complex and long. Despite the fact that there are similitudes between the authors: - both are authors structure twentieth century; - both approaching demise as a primary topic, they staying unruffled notwithstanding passing wonder; - both are managing the thought of religion, connecting it with the subject of death, being realized that, around then, Romantic time, the religion was viewed as out of date. In spite of the fact that their works were extraordinary and unique, difficult to emulate, however subjects they concentrated on, were the same. Whitman's style presented the idea of free verse, this style turning into his unique imprint. Additionally, his boldness to manage "unthinkable" subjects, in particular sex, human body, and various other brought perspective changes of the American open of verse. Dickinson's works are pretty much as one of a kind, because of her odd position of accentuation, uncommon linguistic use, and straightforwardness of dialect. Her lines end suddenly, apparently harmless words are frequently promoted, and her inclination to compose meters common of hymn books all recognizes her from different journalists. Pundits have hailed the beginning of writer ladies, Walt Whitman like , othe rworldly and succinct, perceiving in artist the exemplified soul and magic of New England. Later nearing ubiquity of "pious devotee of Amherst" was the most merited, high perspectives invigorating her sonnets, the easiest expressions having the center of its motivation.

Admission Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 10

Admission - Essay Example As students, we were regularly tasked with coming up with project in groups of five or thereof, these tasks equipped me with the ability to tolerate and work with people of different natures and principles contrary to mine. The tasks also gave me valuable knowledge on how to ensure maximum productivity in groups and meet deadlines. I can actively employ these skills in my professional life where I am tasked with working with my colleagues. I can also use the skills to ensure that deadlines are met to ensure maximum productivity My undergraduate studies gave me valuable lessons on leadership. The coursework contained tenets on business management and how to ensure business success (Norman 35) .In the classroom I learnt how to lead and handle crisis situations. As a project leader, I gained valuable knowledge on how to motivate my group members to ensure maximum productivity. I also learnt how to cope with uncooperative members. The leadership skills would prove invaluable to public service especially if given a managerial position. The ability to motivate my colleagues in situations where an institution is making losses would be necessary. It would also help me to maintain the morale of the employees. My experience as a volunteer with the World Health Organization was pivotal in my learning experience. Among the many students who volunteered during the 2004 cholera outbreak, only a few of us remained by the end of the containment period (Geudens 36). This experience taught me the value of commitment to set goals and agendas. I learnt that without commitment, one would not achieve the desired results. This skillset would be useful in my public service especially as pertains quality service delivery. Commitment to my duties will be important in the achievement of institutional goals and objectives. My six months training as a cadet in the military taught me how to cope with